BlogIaC

Pulumi vs Terraform: choosing your IaC tool

Real programming languages vs HCL: how state handling, unit testing, blast radius, and your team's skills should decide between Pulumi and Terraform.

Jul 30, 2024·7 min readBeginner

Pulumi and Terraform solve the same problem — declarative, stateful infrastructure — but disagree on the language. Terraform uses HCL, a purpose-built config DSL; Pulumi uses real languages (TypeScript, Python, Go, C#). The right choice is mostly about your team and your testing needs, not features.

The core difference
Terraform / OpenTofu
HCL config DSL
huge provider + module ecosystem
plan output everyone reads
ops-friendly
Pulumi
real languages
loops, functions, unit tests
reuse app libraries
dev-friendly

Reach for Pulumi when

Your team is engineers who want loops, abstractions, and real unit tests around infrastructure; or you are generating lots of similar resources where HCL's for_each starts to strain.

Reach for Terraform when

You want the largest provider/module ecosystem, a plan output that ops and auditors can read without knowing a programming language, and the biggest hiring pool. OpenTofu gives you the same with an open-source license.

Both keep state; both need discipline
Remote state, locking, secret handling, and CI gates matter identically in either tool. The language is the smaller decision — pick for the people who will maintain it.
Go deeper in a coursePulumiIaC in real languages — TypeScript, Python, Go, and C#.View course

Related posts